LOGAN ***1/2
Christopher Nolan returns for his latest outing which is probably his most ambitious movie yet. "Dunkirk" is about the famous evacuation from Dunkirk in World War II, and I was absolutely enthralled by what I was watching. From a technical standpoint, everything in this film creates this tension and realism that I've never experienced before. Watching "Dunkirk" felt real. The suspenseful music by Hans Zimmer, and the jaw-dropping cinematography from Hoyte Van Hoytema are big highlights of the film, and are a testament to how visually outstanding Nolan can be with his movies. However, even though the technicality and tension are there, and I was invested in it, the writing is lackluster. There was some dialogue between certain characters that, while well-acted, fell a little flat. The movie is edited in a way that different timelines are happening simultaneously throughout the film, and it left me confused and not too invested with the personal side of the characters. But if you know me, I am a geek for movies that are amazing from a technical standpoint, and this movie hits all of the right buttons.
CHASE ***
It’s not so much that the characters where lackluster, it’s more that there was no attempt to flesh any of them out. Usually when I go into a war time movie like “Dunkirk”, I like to at least connect to one character that I want to root for and it doesn’t felt like they delivered on that. Despite this major weakness however, almost everything else is really strong. Throughout its entire runtime, there is a certain sense of unease in the story that is largely attributed to how the action scenes were directed as well as the unsettling music playing. This helps create tension, but I think what would've made it even better is if there were at least a few characters that we wanted to pull for. What potentially could’ve been a great movie is simply a really good movie. It’s worth checking out, but I believe that there are better Nolan movies out there.
LANDON ***
BANGERANG SCORE: ***